Martino v. Carey

568 F. Supp. 848 (D. Or. 1983) · United States District Court for the District of Oregon · June 15, 1983 · No. Civ. No. 81-751-RE

Summary

The U.S. District Court for the District of Oregon addresses the attorney-fee phase of a civil-rights class action challenging conditions of confinement at the Umatilla County Jail. Applying the Johnson and Kerr factors, the court finds that plaintiffs' counsel reasonably expended 977.35 hours at a $125 hourly rate and awards a total fee of $195,470, including an enhancement. The court also orders immediate payment of $55,597.50, which defendants' experts identified as the minimum reasonable fee.

Holdings

  1. Plaintiffs' counsel reasonably expended 977.35 hours on the case, and the hours were compensable because they were necessary rather than wasteful or duplicative.
  2. The appropriate hourly rate was $125, the highest customary rate charged by private attorneys in the relevant Oregon legal market for complex federal litigation.
  3. The lodestar required a significant enhancement, resulting in compensation of $200 per hour and a 1.6 multiplier.
  4. The court awarded plaintiffs $195,470 in attorney's fees, calculated by compensating 977.35 hours at $200 per hour.
  5. Defendants were required to pay $55,597.50 within thirty days because that amount was conceded to be reasonable and could not be challenged in good faith while the remainder of the award was potentially appealed.

Questions Presented

  1. What attorney's-fee award was reasonable under 42 U.S.C. § 1988 for the plaintiff class's successful civil-rights litigation?
  2. Whether plaintiffs' counsel reasonably expended 977.35 hours on the litigation.
  3. What hourly rate should be used to calculate the lodestar under § 1988?
  4. Whether the lodestar should be enhanced by a multiplier based on the complexity, contingency, results obtained, undesirability, and other Johnson factors.
  5. Whether defendants should be ordered to pay immediately the portion of the fee award they conceded was reasonable.

Disposition

other

Cases Cited (9)

  • Martino v. Carey, 563 F. Supp. 984 (D. Or. 1983)(followed)
  • Johnson v. Georgia Highway Express, 488 F.2d 714, 717-719 (5th Cir. 1974)(followed)
  • Kerr v. Screen Extras Guild, 526 F.2d 67, 70 (9th Cir. 1975)(followed)
  • Hensley v. Eckerhart, 461 U.S. 424 (1983)(followed)
  • Hoptowit v. Ray, 682 F.2d 1237 (9th Cir. 1982)(followed)
  • American Constitutional Party v. Munro, 650 F.2d 184, 187 (9th Cir. 1981)(followed)
  • Suzuki v. Yuen, 678 F.2d 761, 764 (9th Cir. 1982)(followed)
  • Jordan v. Multnomah County, 694 F.2d 1156, 1158 (9th Cir. 1982)(followed)
  • 425 U.S. 951, 96 S. Ct. 1726, 48 L. Ed. 2d 195 (1976)(cited)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…

More from Oregon United States District Court For The District