Summary
The U.S. District Court for the District of Oregon addresses the attorney-fee phase of a civil-rights class action challenging conditions of confinement at the Umatilla County Jail. Applying the Johnson and Kerr factors, the court finds that plaintiffs' counsel reasonably expended 977.35 hours at a $125 hourly rate and awards a total fee of $195,470, including an enhancement. The court also orders immediate payment of $55,597.50, which defendants' experts identified as the minimum reasonable fee.
Holdings
- Plaintiffs' counsel reasonably expended 977.35 hours on the case, and the hours were compensable because they were necessary rather than wasteful or duplicative.
- The appropriate hourly rate was $125, the highest customary rate charged by private attorneys in the relevant Oregon legal market for complex federal litigation.
- The lodestar required a significant enhancement, resulting in compensation of $200 per hour and a 1.6 multiplier.
- The court awarded plaintiffs $195,470 in attorney's fees, calculated by compensating 977.35 hours at $200 per hour.
- Defendants were required to pay $55,597.50 within thirty days because that amount was conceded to be reasonable and could not be challenged in good faith while the remainder of the award was potentially appealed.
Questions Presented
- What attorney's-fee award was reasonable under 42 U.S.C. § 1988 for the plaintiff class's successful civil-rights litigation?
- Whether plaintiffs' counsel reasonably expended 977.35 hours on the litigation.
- What hourly rate should be used to calculate the lodestar under § 1988?
- Whether the lodestar should be enhanced by a multiplier based on the complexity, contingency, results obtained, undesirability, and other Johnson factors.
- Whether defendants should be ordered to pay immediately the portion of the fee award they conceded was reasonable.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (9)
- Martino v. Carey, 563 F. Supp. 984 (D. Or. 1983)(followed)
- Johnson v. Georgia Highway Express, 488 F.2d 714, 717-719 (5th Cir. 1974)(followed)
- Kerr v. Screen Extras Guild, 526 F.2d 67, 70 (9th Cir. 1975)(followed)
- Hensley v. Eckerhart, 461 U.S. 424 (1983)(followed)
- Hoptowit v. Ray, 682 F.2d 1237 (9th Cir. 1982)(followed)
- American Constitutional Party v. Munro, 650 F.2d 184, 187 (9th Cir. 1981)(followed)
- Suzuki v. Yuen, 678 F.2d 761, 764 (9th Cir. 1982)(followed)
- Jordan v. Multnomah County, 694 F.2d 1156, 1158 (9th Cir. 1982)(followed)
- 425 U.S. 951, 96 S. Ct. 1726, 48 L. Ed. 2d 195 (1976)(cited)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…