Hunterstown Ruritan Club v. Straban Township Zoning Hearing Board

143 A.3d 538 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2016) · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · July 14, 2016 · No. No. 1204 C.D. 2015

Summary

The Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court considered whether a go-cart racing operation constituted a lawful pre-existing nonconforming use on Saturdays and Sundays, despite a zoning officer's certificate recognizing racing only on Saturdays. The court held that the certificate documented but did not limit the constitutionally protected nonconforming use, reversed the trial court, and remanded for further proceedings concerning the scope of any natural expansion.

Holdings

  1. Because the Board found that Sunday go-cart racing occurred before the zoning ordinance was enacted and the record did not show abandonment, the Club's lawful nonconforming use included Sunday racing.
  2. A certificate of nonconformance documents the existence of a nonconforming use but cannot expand, limit, or extinguish a lawful nonconforming use; failure to appeal the certificate caused only a procedural disadvantage and did not waive the Club's property right to conduct Sunday racing.
  3. The Board and trial court erred in determining that the Club could not conduct Sunday racing based on the certificate and the proposed-use application. The court did not decide whether the Club's current Sunday racing fell within the natural-expansion doctrine because the Board made no findings on that issue.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the Club's lawful pre-existing nonconforming use included Sunday go-cart racing that occurred before the 1992 zoning ordinance.
  2. Whether the zoning officer's certificate of nonconformance could limit or extinguish the Club's constitutionally protected right to continue Sunday racing.
  3. Whether the Board properly treated the Club's request to conduct the same nonconforming use on Sundays as an expansion subject to the ordinance's special-exception standards.
  4. Whether the record supported a determination under the natural-expansion doctrine.

Disposition

reversed_and_remanded

Cases Cited (20)

  • Good v. Zoning Hearing Board of Heidelberg Township, 967 A.2d 421, 423 n.5 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2009)(followed)
  • DoMiJo, LLC v. McClain, 41 A.3d 967, 972-73 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2012)(followed)
  • Smalley v. Zoning Hearing Board of Middletown Township, 834 A.2d 535, 539, 544 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2003)(followed)
  • Pennsylvania Northwest Distributors, Inc. v. Zoning Hearing Board of Moon Township, 584 A.2d 1372, 1375 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 1991)(followed)
  • Nettleton v. Zoning Hearing Board of Pittsburgh, 828 A.2d 1033, 1037 n.3 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2003)(followed)
  • Humphreys v. Stuart Realty, 73 A.2d 407, 409 (Pa. 1950)(followed)
  • Limley v. Zoning Hearing Board of Port Vue Borough, 625 A.2d 54 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 1993)(followed)
  • Pappas v. Zoning Board of Adjustment of City of Philadelphia, 589 A.2d 675 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 1991)(followed)
  • Chartiers Township v. William H. Martin, Inc., 542 A.2d 985 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 1988)(followed)
  • Silver v. Zoning Board of Adjustment, 255 A.2d 506, 507 (Pa. 1969)(followed)

Showing top 10 of 20.

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…