Summary
The Pennsylvania Superior Court reviewed Timothy Gibson’s appeal from convictions for possession of a controlled substance, obstructing the administration of law, and possession of drug paraphernalia. The court held that county probation officers had ancillary authority to stop and frisk a non-supervisee present during a probation visit, but lacked reasonable suspicion that criminal activity was afoot and that officer-safety concerns did not justify the forcible seizure described in the record. The court therefore vacated Gibson’s judgment of sentence.
Holdings
- County probation officers have ancillary authority, consistent with the Fourth Amendment, to take constitutionally permissible protective actions concerning a third party encountered while carrying out their statutory supervisory duties.
- The officers lacked reasonable suspicion that Gibson was engaged in criminal activity, so the seizure was unconstitutional under the Fourth Amendment.
- A Terry frisk may be justified when a probation officer lawfully performing supervisory duties has reasonable suspicion that a third party is armed and dangerous, even absent reasonable suspicion that the third party is engaged in criminal activity.
- The officer's forcible restraint and order requiring Gibson to remain seated were not sufficiently limited to the protective purpose of discovering and neutralizing weapons; the trial court therefore erred in denying suppression.
Questions Presented
- Whether county probation officers possess ancillary authority to detain and frisk a third party encountered during a lawful probationary home visit.
- Whether the officers had reasonable suspicion that criminal activity was afoot to justify seizing Gibson under Terry.
- Whether the officer's safety concern independently justified a Terry frisk of Gibson absent reasonable suspicion of criminal activity.
- Whether physically restraining Gibson and requiring him to remain in the living room was a permissible, appropriately limited protective action.
Disposition
reversed_and_remanded
Cases Cited (29)
- Commonwealth v. Mathis, 173 A.3d 699 (Pa. 2017)(followed and extended)
- Commonwealth v. Wolfel, 233 A.3d 784 (Pa. 2020)(followed)
- Kopko v. Miller, 892 A.2d 766 (Pa. 2006)(followed)
- Commonwealth v. Price, 672 A.2d 280 (Pa. 1996)(followed)
- Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968)(followed)
- Dunaway v. New York, 442 U.S. 200 (1979)(followed)
- Adams v. Williams, 407 U.S. 143 (1972)(followed)
- Commonwealth v. Hicks, 208 A.3d 916 (Pa. 2019)(distinguished)
- Florida v. J.L., 529 U.S. 266 (2000)(followed)
- Commonwealth v. Reppert, 814 A.2d 1196 (Pa. Super. 2002)(followed)
Showing top 10 of 29.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…