Summary
This Adoption Report explains the Pennsylvania Civil Procedural Rules Committee's recommended amendments to Pennsylvania Rule of Civil Procedure 401. The amendments replace the requirement that a prothonotary “write” on original process with a requirement to “designate” it for reissuance or reinstatement, and clarify when a new defendant may be added. The amendment became effective April 1, 2022.
Holdings
- The rule was amended to require the prothonotary to designate, rather than write on, the original process or a copy presented for reissuance or reinstatement, thereby accommodating electronically filed documents.
- A new defendant may be named in a reissued writ or reinstated complaint under Rule 401(b)(2) only if the writ or complaint has not been served on any originally named defendant.
Questions Presented
- How should Rule 401(b)(1) apply to electronically filed writs of summons and complaints when process is reissued or reinstated?
- When may a new defendant be named in a reissued writ or reinstated complaint under Rule 401(b)(2)?
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (1)
- Yates v. Pacor, 507 A.2d 1258 (Pa. Super. 1986)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…