Summary
The court reviewed the Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare's denial of the plaintiff's application for a disability freeze and disability benefits under the Social Security Act. It reversed the agency decision, holding that the record lacked a realistic showing that the plaintiff, who could no longer perform coal-mining work and had limited education and physical impairments, had a reasonable opportunity to obtain substantial gainful employment in another occupation.
Holdings
- The Secretary's findings were without foundation in the record because the record failed to establish that plaintiff could perform specific light jobs or that he had a realistic opportunity to engage in substantial gainful employment.
- It is not enough to speculate that a claimant might perform one of numerous light jobs; the record must realistically show both that the claimant could perform the identified work and that a reasonable opportunity existed for the claimant to obtain substantial gainful employment.
Questions Presented
- Whether the Secretary's denial of a disability freeze and monthly disability benefits was supported by substantial evidence in the administrative record.
- Whether merely suggesting unspecified light occupations, without evidence that plaintiff could perform them or that a reasonable opportunity existed for him to obtain such employment, satisfied the requirement of showing substantial gainful employment capacity.
Disposition
reversed
Cases Cited (1)
- Hodgson v. Celebrezze, 312 F.2d 260 (3d Cir. 1963)(applied by comparison)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…