Cerveceria India, Inc. v. Union Independiente De Trabajadores De La Cerveceria India, Inc.

437 F. Supp. 129 (D.P.R. 1977) · United States District Court for the District of Puerto Rico · October 3, 1977

Summary

The court considered an employer's request for a preliminary injunction under the Boys Market doctrine to enjoin a work stoppage arising from a union-directed refusal to comply with an inspection rule. The court declined to exercise jurisdiction because related contempt and injunctive proceedings were pending before the Supreme Court of Puerto Rico and could resolve the issues presented. The complaint and counterclaim were dismissed without prejudice.

Holdings

  1. The court declined to determine whether the prerequisites for a Boys Market injunction were satisfied because it refrained from assuming jurisdiction over the dispute.
  2. The court exercised its discretion to refrain from assuming jurisdiction because the ongoing Puerto Rico Supreme Court proceedings encompassed the issues in the federal case and implicated that court's authority to enforce its prior order.
  3. The court dismissed the complaint and counterclaim without prejudice but expressly stated that it was not dismissing the case under the traditional forms of the abstention doctrine.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the federal court should issue a preliminary injunction against the work stoppage under the Boys Market doctrine.
  2. Whether the federal court should refrain from exercising jurisdiction because related proceedings concerning the same inspection dispute and the employer's alleged contempt were pending before the Supreme Court of Puerto Rico.
  3. Whether the complaint and counterclaim should be dismissed without prejudice rather than dismissed under a traditional abstention doctrine.

Disposition

dismissed

Cases Cited (4)

  • The Boys Market, Inc. v. Retail Clerks Union, 398 U.S. 235, 90 S. Ct. 1583, 26 L. Ed. 2d 199 (1970)(followed)
  • Kerotest Mfg. Co. v. C-O-Two Fire Equipment Co., 342 U.S. 180, 183, 72 S. Ct. 219, 221, 96 L. Ed. 200 (1952)(followed)
  • Columbia Plaza Co. v. Security National Bank, 173 U.S. App. D.C. 403, 525 F.2d 620 (1975)(followed)
  • Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United States, 424 U.S. 800, 96 S. Ct. 1236, 47 L. Ed. 2d 483 (1976)(discussed)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…