Summary
The Rhode Island Supreme Court held that a private-sector employee’s unfair-representation claim against a union was governed by the federal six-month statute of limitations under 29 U.S.C. § 160(b). Because the claim involved interpretation of a collective-bargaining agreement, it was preempted under § 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act. The court distinguished its prior decision applying Rhode Island’s three-year limitations period to a municipal employee’s claim and affirmed summary judgment for the union.
Holdings
- A private-sector employee's unfair-representation claim against a union is governed by the federal six-month statute of limitations when the dispute concerns interpretation of a collective-bargaining agreement and is therefore preempted under § 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act.
- McDonald's application of Rhode Island's three-year statute of limitations is limited to unfair-representation actions brought by municipal or state employees against public-sector unions.
Questions Presented
- Whether a private-sector employee's unfair-representation action against a union, arising from a grievance requiring interpretation of a collective-bargaining agreement, is governed by the federal six-month statute of limitations in 29 U.S.C. § 160(b).
- Whether McDonald v. Rhode Island General Council required application of Rhode Island's three-year statute of limitations to the claim.
Disposition
affirmed
Cases Cited (6)
- McDonald v. Rhode Island General Council, 505 A.2d 1176 (R.I. 1986)(limited)
- Church v. McBurney, 513 A.2d 22 (R.I. 1986)(followed)
- DelCostello v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, 462 U.S. 151 (1983)(followed)
- Lathrop v. Entenmann’s, Inc., 770 P.2d 1367 (Colo. Ct. App. 1989)(consistent_with)
- Lingle v. Norge Division of Magic Chef, Inc., 486 U.S. 399 (1988)(followed)
- Reed v. United Transportation Union, 488 U.S. 319 (1989)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…