John J. Tworog v. Dolores M. Tworog

45 A.3d 1194 (R.I. 2012) · Supreme Court of Rhode Island · July 2, 2012 · No. Nos. 2009-307-Appeal, 2011-95-Appeal

Summary

The Rhode Island Supreme Court affirmed Family Court orders denying John Tworog's motion to reopen the final judgment of divorce and finding him in contempt. The court held that he failed to establish fraud or misrepresentation concerning his former wife's retirement account, particularly because he had not sought discovery or a financial disclosure form. The court also upheld the contempt finding based on his failure to keep current on mortgage and household obligations, concluding that any error concerning the effect of a line of credit was harmless.

Holdings

  1. The Family Court properly denied John's motion to reopen the final judgment because he failed to provide evidence sufficient to establish fraud or misrepresentation warranting relief, and his failure to request discovery or a DR-6 form was fatal to his claim.
  2. The Family Court did not abuse its discretion in finding John in contempt because he failed to pay the mortgages and household bills as required by the final judgment and the subsequent order. Any error in characterizing the $6,000 line of credit as further encumbering the real estate was harmless.
  3. A direct appeal was proper because the contempt finding did not concern modification of alimony or child support, the categories for which Rhode Island law requires review by writ of certiorari.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the Family Court abused its discretion by denying John's motion to reopen the final judgment of divorce based on alleged fraud, misrepresentation, or other misconduct concerning Dolores's 401(k) plan.
  2. Whether the Family Court erred in finding John in contempt for failing to comply with orders requiring payment of the mortgages and household bills and for further encumbering the marital real estate.
  3. Whether John's direct appeal from the contempt order was procedurally proper rather than reviewable only by writ of certiorari.

Disposition

affirmed

Cases Cited (10)

  • Esposito v. Esposito, 38 A.3d 1, 4 (R.I. 2012)(followed)
  • Curry v. Curry, 987 A.2d 233, 237-238 (R.I. 2010)(followed)
  • Flynn v. Al-Amir, 811 A.2d 1146, 1150 (R.I. 2002)(followed)
  • Webster v. Perrotta, 774 A.2d 68, 75 (R.I. 2001)(followed)
  • Ayriyan v. Ayriyan, 994 A.2d 1207, 1215-1216 (R.I. 2010)(followed)
  • State v. Lead Industries Association, Inc., 951 A.2d 428, 464 (R.I. 2008)(followed)
  • Nardone v. Ritacco, 936 A.2d 200, 204 (R.I. 2007)(followed)
  • Gorman v. Gorman, 883 A.2d 732, 741 (R.I. 2005)(not reached)
  • Wooldridge v. Wooldridge, 940 A.2d 1082, 1085 (Me. 2008)(cited)
  • Matthews v. Commissioner of Correction, 449 Mass. 1021, 868 N.E.2d 602, 604, 605 n. 5 (2007)(cited)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…