Carmella Bucci v. Hurd Buick Pontiac GMC Truck, LLC

85 A.3d 1160 (R.I. 2014) · Supreme Court of Rhode Island · March 4, 2014 · No. 2011-163-C.A. (PC 08-231)

Summary

The Rhode Island Supreme Court affirmed summary judgment for Hurd Buick Pontiac GMC Truck, LLC in Carmella Bucci’s claims of age and disability discrimination under the Rhode Island Fair Employment Practices Act. Applying the McDonnell-Douglas burden-shifting framework, the Court assumed without deciding that Bucci established a prima facie age-discrimination case, held that Hurd articulated legitimate nondiscriminatory reasons for the termination, and concluded that Bucci failed to demonstrate pretext. The Court also held that Bucci waived appellate review of her disability-discrimination claim by failing to develop the argument in her brief.

Holdings

  1. Bucci waived appellate review of her disability-discrimination claim by merely identifying the issue without meaningful discussion or legal briefing.
  2. The court assumed, without deciding, that Bucci established a prima facie case of age discrimination because the Superior Court had made the same assumption and the burden at that stage is not especially onerous.
  3. Hurd satisfied its burden of producing legitimate nondiscriminatory reasons for terminating Bucci.
  4. Bucci failed to present sufficient evidence that Hurd's legitimate nondiscriminatory reasons were a pretext for age discrimination; therefore, summary judgment for Hurd was proper.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the Superior Court properly granted summary judgment on Bucci's age-discrimination claim under the McDonnell-Douglas burden-shifting framework.
  2. Whether Bucci presented sufficient evidence that Hurd's legitimate nondiscriminatory reasons for termination were pretextual and that age discrimination was the real reason for the termination.
  3. Whether Bucci's disability-discrimination claim was preserved for appellate review when her brief did not meaningfully develop the issue.

Disposition

affirmed

Cases Cited (20)

  • McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green, 411 U.S. 792 (1973)(applied)
  • Sullo v. Greenberg, 68 A.3d 404, 406-407 (R.I. 2013)(followed)
  • Sacco v. Cranston School Department, 53 A.3d 147, 149-150 (R.I. 2012)(followed)
  • Neri v. Ross-Simons, Inc., 897 A.2d 42, 48-50 (R.I. 2006)(followed)
  • Newport Shipyard, Inc. v. Rhode Island Commission for Human Rights, 484 A.2d 893, 898 (R.I. 1984)(followed)
  • McGarry v. Pielech, 47 A.3d 271, 280-281 (R.I. 2012)(followed)
  • Center for Behavioral Health, Rhode Island, Inc. v. Barros, 710 A.2d 680, 685-686 (R.I. 1998)(distinguished)
  • State v. Chase, 9 A.3d 1248, 1256 (R.I. 2010)(followed)
  • State v. Rolon, 45 A.3d 518, 519 n.1 (R.I. 2012)(followed)
  • Lane v. First National Bank of Boston, 871 F.2d 166, 175 (1st Cir. 1989)(followed)

Showing top 10 of 20.

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…