Summary
The Rhode Island Supreme Court affirmed summary judgment for the State of Rhode Island in a negligence action arising from injuries allegedly caused by a pothole on a state roadway. The court held that the public duty doctrine barred the plaintiff’s personal-injury claim because pothole repair is a discretionary governmental function not ordinarily performed by private individuals. The court also held that Rhode General Laws § 24-8-35 provides a limited remedy for motor-vehicle damage and does not authorize recovery for personal injuries.
Holdings
- Section 24-8-35 is a limited waiver of sovereign immunity and limited abrogation of the public duty doctrine that permits recovery only for damage to a motor vehicle, up to $300; it does not extend to personal-injury claims.
- The public duty doctrine bars the plaintiff's negligence claim against the state for failure to repair a pothole on a public roadway because roadway maintenance, including pothole repair, is a discretionary governmental function shielded from tort liability.
- The private-citizen exception does not apply because private individuals do not build, repair, or maintain public roads; pothole repair on a state roadway is not an activity normally performed by private citizens.
Questions Presented
- Whether G.L. 1956 § 24-8-35 creates an exception to the public duty doctrine that permits recovery for personal injuries caused by a pothole on a state roadway.
- Whether the public duty doctrine bars a negligence claim against the state for failing to repair a pothole on a public roadway.
- Whether the exception for activities normally performed by private citizens applies to pothole repair on a state roadway.
- Whether summary judgment was properly granted to the State of Rhode Island.
Disposition
affirmed
Cases Cited (13)
- Yanku v. Walgreen Co., 224 A.3d 1130, 1132-1133 (R.I. 2020)(followed)
- Ballard v. SVF Foundation, 181 A.3d 27, 34 (R.I. 2018)(followed)
- Iselin v. Retirement Board of Employees’ Retirement System of Rhode Island, 943 A.2d 1045, 1049 (R.I. 2008)(followed)
- Accent Store Design, Inc. v. Marathon House, Inc., 674 A.2d 1223, 1226 (R.I. 1996)(followed)
- Morales v. Town of Johnston, 895 A.2d 721, 730 (R.I. 2006)(followed)
- Schultz v. Foster-Glocester Regional School District, 755 A.2d 153, 155 (R.I. 2000)(followed)
- Catone v. Medberry, 555 A.2d 328, 333 (R.I. 1989)(followed)
- DeFusco v. Todesca Forte, Inc., 683 A.2d 363, 364-365 (R.I. 1996)(followed)
- Toegemann v. City of Providence, 21 A.3d 384, 388 (R.I. 2011)(followed)
- Catri v. Hopkins, 609 A.2d 966, 968 (R.I. 1992)(followed)
Showing top 10 of 13.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…