Summary
The Rhode Island Supreme Court affirmed a Family Court decree terminating the respondent mother’s parental rights to her son under G.L. 1956 § 15-7-7(a)(3). The Court held that clear and convincing evidence supported findings that the child had been in DCYF custody for more than twelve months, reunification was not substantially probable within a reasonable time, and termination was in the child’s best interests. The Court did not reach the separate substance-use ground because the § 15-7-7(a)(3) ground independently supported termination.
Holdings
- The Family Court properly found the respondent mother unfit under R.I. Gen. Laws § 15-7-7(a)(3), because Donnell had been in DCYF custody and care for at least twelve months, the mother had been offered or received services, and there was not a substantial probability that Donnell could safely return to her care within a reasonable period considering his age and need for permanency.
- The Family Court properly found that termination of the respondent mother's parental rights was in Donnell's best interests.
- Because the Supreme Court affirmed the finding of unfitness under § 15-7-7(a)(3), it did not need to address whether the mother's chronic substance-use disorder independently supported termination under § 15-7-7(a)(2)(iii).
Questions Presented
- Whether the Family Court clearly erred in finding the respondent mother unfit under R.I. Gen. Laws § 15-7-7(a)(3) because Donnell had been in DCYF custody for at least twelve months, services had been offered or received, and there was no substantial probability of safe reunification within a reasonable period.
- Whether the Family Court clearly erred in finding that termination of the mother's parental rights was in Donnell's best interests.
- Whether the Supreme Court needed to reach the alternative chronic-substance-abuse ground under R.I. Gen. Laws § 15-7-7(a)(2)(iii) after affirming termination under subsection (a)(3).
Disposition
affirmed
Cases Cited (13)
- In re Gelvin B., 251 A.3d 503, 508-09, 511 (R.I. 2021)(followed)
- In re Violet G., 212 A.3d 160, 166-67 (R.I. 2019)(followed)
- In re Destiny D., 922 A.2d 168, 172 (R.I. 2007)(followed)
- Santosky v. Kramer, 455 U.S. 745, 753 (1982)(followed)
- In re Pricillion R., 971 A.2d 599, 604 (R.I. 2009)(followed)
- In re Victoria L., 950 A.2d 1168, 1174 (R.I. 2008)(followed)
- In re Elana W., 249 A.3d 287, 293 (R.I. 2021)(followed)
- In re Brooklyn M., 933 A.2d 1113, 1122 (R.I. 2007)(followed)
- In re Davyon G., 10 A.3d 448, 455 (R.I. 2010)(followed)
- In re William, Susan, and Joseph, 448 A.2d 1250, 1251 (R.I. 1982)(followed)
Showing top 10 of 13.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…