Summary
The Supreme Court of South Carolina dismissed as improvidently granted the State’s writ of certiorari seeking review of the Court of Appeals’ informal letter denial of a Rule 227 petition in a post-conviction relief matter. The court held that it will not entertain Rule 226 petitions reviewing such letter denials because the Court of Appeals’ discretionary denial does not constitute a special reason justifying Supreme Court review.
Holdings
- The Supreme Court will not entertain Rule 226 petitions seeking review of a Court of Appeals letter denial of a Rule 227 certiorari petition in a PCR matter when the Court of Appeals has exercised its discretion and issued no formal opinion or order.
Questions Presented
- Whether the Supreme Court should entertain a Rule 226 petition seeking review of the Court of Appeals' discretionary denial of a Rule 227 PCR certiorari petition by informal letter.
- Whether the Court of Appeals' denial of PCR certiorari constitutes a special reason justifying the Supreme Court's exercise of certiorari jurisdiction.
Disposition
dismissed
Cases Cited (3)
- In re Exhaustion of State Remedies in Criminal and Post-Conviction Relief Cases, 321 S.C. 563, 471 S.E.2d 454 (1990)(followed)
- Douglas v. State, 369 S.C. 213, 631 S.E.2d 542 (2006)(followed)
- Dunlap v. State, 371 S.C. 585, 641 S.E.2d 431 (2007)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…