Summary
The Supreme Court of South Carolina held that the evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to the defendant, supported a jury instruction on voluntary manslaughter as a lesser offense of murder. The court concluded that the evidence presented a jury question as to whether the police officer attempted a lawful arrest using unnecessary violence, which could constitute sufficient legal provocation. The court reversed the murder conviction and death sentence and remanded for further proceedings.
Holdings
- The evidence warranted a voluntary manslaughter instruction because a jury could reasonably find that the officer attempted an arrest or detention through unnecessary violence, providing sufficient legal provocation.
- The trial court erred by holding as a matter of law that the officer was effectuating a lawful arrest in a lawful manner when he tackled Cottrell from behind.
Questions Presented
- Whether the evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to Cottrell, supported a jury instruction on voluntary manslaughter as a lesser included offense of murder.
- Whether the trial court improperly resolved as a matter of law that the officer was effectuating a lawful arrest in a lawful manner when he tackled Cottrell from behind.
Disposition
reversed_and_remanded
Cases Cited (6)
- State v. Cole, 338 S.C. 97, 525 S.E.2d 511 (2000)(followed)
- State v. Pittman, 373 S.C. 527, 647 S.E.2d 144 (2007)(followed)
- State v. Linder, 276 S.C. 304, 278 S.E.2d 335 (1981)(followed)
- State v. Childers, 373 S.C. 367, 645 S.E.2d 233 (2007)(cited)
- State v. Wood, 362 S.C. 135, 607 S.E.2d 57 (2004)(cited)
- State v. Bell, 374 S.C. 136, 646 S.E.2d 888 (Ct. App. 2007)(cited)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…