Summary
The South Carolina Supreme Court held that lease-purchase and installment-purchase payments for school capital improvements qualify as expenses for "school operating purposes." Accordingly, the plaintiff school districts were entitled to tier-three reimbursement from the Homestead Exemption Fund for taxes lost under the owner-occupied residential property exemption. The court issued a declaratory judgment for the plaintiffs, while separate opinions included a concurrence and a dissent.
Holdings
- Payments under lease-purchase and installment-purchase agreements used for school capital construction improvements fall within the phrase "school operating purposes" under the applicable property-tax exemption statutes.
- The plaintiff school districts are entitled to tier-three reimbursements under S.C. Code section 11-11-156(A)(1) for expenses incurred under lease-purchase and installment-purchase agreements for capital construction improvements during fiscal year 2007-2008.
Questions Presented
- Whether payments under lease-purchase and installment-purchase agreements used to finance school capital improvements fall within the phrase "school operating purposes" in S.C. Code sections 12-37-220(B)(47)(a) and 11-11-156(A)(1).
- Whether the plaintiff school districts are entitled to tier-three reimbursement from the Homestead Exemption Fund for those payments.
Disposition
approved
Cases Cited (17)
- Redmond v. Lexington County School District No. Four, 314 S.C. 431, 445 S.E.2d 441 (1994)(followed)
- Caddell v. Lexington County School District No. 1, 296 S.C. 397, 373 S.E.2d 598 (1988)(followed)
- Colleton County Taxpayers Ass'n v. School District of Colleton County, 371 S.C. 224, 638 S.E.2d 685 (2006)(followed)
- Felts v. Richland County, 303 S.C. 354, 400 S.E.2d 781 (1991)(followed)
- W. Va. Pulp & Paper Co. v. Riddock, 225 S.C. 283, 82 S.E.2d 189 (1954)(followed)
- Hawkins v. Bruno Yacht Sales, Inc., 353 S.C. 31, 577 S.E.2d 202 (2003)(followed)
- Hitachi Data Systems Corp. v. Leatherman, 309 S.C. 174, 420 S.E.2d 843 (1992)(followed)
- Brown v. South Carolina Department of Health & Environmental Control, 348 S.C. 507, 560 S.E.2d 410 (2002)(limited)
- Nucor Steel v. South Carolina Public Service Commission, 310 S.C. 539, 426 S.E.2d 319 (1992)(followed)
- Hollingsworth on Wheels, Inc. v. Greenville County Treasurer, 276 S.C. 314, 278 S.E.2d 340 (1981)(distinguished)
Showing top 10 of 17.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…