Holmes v. National Service Industries, Inc., 395 S.C. 305

717 S.E.2d 751 (2011) · Supreme Court of South Carolina · October 24, 2011 · No. No. 27059

Summary

The South Carolina Supreme Court affirmed the Court of Appeals’ holding that Carolyn Holmes’s workers’ compensation claim was barred by the applicable two-year statute of limitations. The court held that substantial evidence supported the Workers’ Compensation Commission’s finding that Holmes knew or should have known of her compensable injury more than two years before filing. A dissent argued that the limitations period did not begin until a physician linked Holmes’s respiratory conditions to her employment.

Holdings

  1. The claim was barred because substantial evidence supported the Commission's finding that Holmes knew or should have known, through reasonable diligence, that she had a compensable injury more than two years before filing.
  2. The court declined to address the issue because affirmance on the statute-of-limitations issue was dispositive.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether substantial evidence supported the Workers' Compensation Commission's finding that Holmes knew or should have known of her compensable injury more than two years before filing her claim.
  2. Whether the Supreme Court needed to address whether the Commission's findings concerning compensability and causation were the law of the case after affirming on the statute-of-limitations issue.

Disposition

affirmed

Cases Cited (14)

  • Jordan v. Kelly Co., 381 S.C. 483, 674 S.E.2d 166 (2009)(followed)
  • Pierre v. Seaside Farms, Inc., 386 S.C. 534, 540, 689 S.E.2d 615, 618 (2010)(followed)
  • Lark v. Bi-Lo, Inc., 276 S.C. 130, 136, 276 S.E.2d 304, 307 (1981)(followed)
  • Dickinson-Tidewater, Inc. v. Supervisor of Assess., 273 Md. 245, 329 A.2d 18, 25 (Md. 1974)(followed)
  • Mauldin v. Dyna-Color/Jack Rabbit, 308 S.C. 18, 20, 416 S.E.2d 639, 640 (1992)(followed)
  • Futch v. McAllister Towing of Georgetown, Inc., 335 S.C. 598, 518 S.E.2d 591 (1999)(followed)
  • Snell v. Columbia Gun Exch., Inc., 276 S.C. 301, 303, 278 S.E.2d 333, 334 (1981)(discussed in dissent)
  • Hanks v. Blair Mills, Inc., 286 S.C. 378, 335 S.E.2d 91 (Ct. App. 1985)(discussed in dissent)
  • Booker v. Int'l Rivercenter, 905 So. 2d 498, 502 (La. Ct. App. 2005)(discussed in dissent)
  • Hatem v. Bryan, 117 N.C. App. 722, 453 S.E.2d 199, 200 (1995)(discussed in dissent)

Showing top 10 of 14.

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…