Summary
The Supreme Court of South Carolina accepted an Agreement for Discipline by Consent involving attorney J.M. Long, III, who admitted misconduct arising from criminal exposure offenses. The court imposed a nine-month suspension retroactive to his interim suspension, required one year of mental health counseling with quarterly reports, and ordered payment of disciplinary costs.
Holdings
- The court accepted the Agreement for Discipline by Consent after respondent admitted the misconduct and consented to discipline.
- Respondent's criminal conduct violated Rule 8.4(b), SCACR, and constituted grounds for discipline under Rule 7(a)(5), RLDE, Rule 413, SCACR.
- Respondent was suspended from the practice of law for nine months, retroactive to the date of his interim suspension, and was required to obtain mental-health counseling, submit quarterly reports, pay disciplinary costs, and file an affidavit demonstrating compliance with Rule 30.
Questions Presented
- Whether the court should accept the Agreement for Discipline by Consent.
- What discipline should be imposed for respondent's violation of Rule 8.4(b), SCACR, and Rule 7(a)(5), RLDE.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (2)
- North Carolina v. Alford, 400 U.S. 25, 91 S. Ct. 160, 27 L. Ed. 2d 162 (1970)(followed)
- In the Matter of Long, 387 S.C. 19, 690 S.E.2d 774 (2010)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…