Summary
The South Carolina Supreme Court affirmed the Court of Appeals' reversal of Randy Wright's conviction for assault and battery of a high and aggravated nature. The court held that when a defendant requests individual jury polling, the trial court must conduct the poll, and denial of that request is reversible per se; the request must be made immediately after the verdict is published or, if collective polling occurs, immediately after that polling concludes.
Holdings
- If a defendant requests individual polling of the jury, the trial court must conduct the poll, individually questioning each juror about whether the juror assented and still assents to the verdict.
- Denial of a defendant's request for individual jury polling is reversible per se.
Questions Presented
- Whether a trial court must conduct an individual poll of the jury when a defendant requests one after the verdict is published.
- Whether denial of a defendant's request for individual jury polling is reversible per se.
- When a request for individual jury polling must be made.
- Whether trial counsel has an affirmative duty to request that the jury be polled.
Disposition
affirmed
Cases Cited (3)
- State v. Wright, 432 S.C. 365, 370, 373, 852 S.E.2d 468, 471-72 (Ct. App. 2020)(followed)
- State v. Linder, 276 S.C. 304, 308-09, 278 S.E.2d 335, 338 (1981)(followed)
- Green v. State, 351 S.C. 184, 196, 569 S.E.2d 318, 324 (2002)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…