Summary
The Supreme Court of South Dakota affirmed the denial of a claim against an estate for unpaid child support arrearages. The court held that the ten-year statute of limitations applied because the Minnesota support order had not been registered or otherwise converted into a judgment of a South Dakota court, which would have qualified for the state’s twenty-year limitations period.
Holdings
- The ten-year statute of limitations in SDCL 15-2-8 applies because Vnuck's claim was not an action upon a judgment or decree of a South Dakota court within the meaning of SDCL 15-2-6.
Questions Presented
- Whether the ten-year statute of limitations in SDCL 15-2-8 or the twenty-year statute of limitations in SDCL 15-2-6 governed Vnuck's claim for child-support arrearages based on a Minnesota support order.
Disposition
affirmed
Cases Cited (3)
- Coble v. Hanson, 2001 SD 8, ¶ 5, 620 N.W.2d 772, 773(followed)
- In re Sales & Use Tax Refund Request of Media One, Inc., 1997 SD 17, ¶ 11, 559 N.W.2d 875, 878(followed)
- Taecker v. Taecker, 527 N.W.2d 295, 299 (S.D. 1995)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…