Summary
The Supreme Court of South Dakota dismissed Schwaller’s direct appeal from her misdemeanor conviction because the conviction was entered by a magistrate court. The court held that appeals from magistrate court generally must proceed first to the circuit court, and that it lacked jurisdiction over the direct appeal.
Holdings
- The Supreme Court of South Dakota lacks jurisdiction to entertain a direct appeal from a judgment of conviction entered by a magistrate court, except for the statutory exception allowing the State to appeal certain pretrial orders under SDCL 23A-32-5.
- The magistrate judge had jurisdiction to preside over and determine the misdemeanor action after being appointed by the presiding judge of the circuit.
Questions Presented
- Whether the South Dakota Supreme Court has jurisdiction over a direct appeal from a misdemeanor conviction entered by a magistrate court with a magistrate judge presiding.
- Whether a defendant convicted in magistrate court must appeal first to the circuit court.
Disposition
dismissed
Cases Cited (4)
- Dale v. City of Sioux Falls, 2003 SD 124, 670 N.W.2d 892 (S.D. 2003)(followed)
- State v. Hoxeng, 315 N.W.2d 308 (S.D. 1982)(followed)
- Double Diamond Constr. v. Farmers Coop., 2003 SD 9, 656 N.W.2d 744 (S.D. 2003)(followed)
- State v. Hare, 260 N.W.2d 224 (S.D. 1977)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…