Summary
The Supreme Court of South Dakota reviewed disputes arising from an employment agreement between Marc Weitzel, M.D., and Sioux Valley Heart Partners, including alleged breach of contract and repayment of forgivable loans. The court affirmed the existence of an enforceable employment agreement but reversed summary judgment on whether the agreement was breached and remanded that issue for trial. It also reversed and remanded the determination concerning Weitzel’s obligation to repay certain loans, while affirming dismissal of his fraud claim.
Holdings
- The July 14, 2000 agreement and the parties' conduct established an enforceable implied employment contract requiring Sioux Valley to permit Weitzel to return on or about August 1, 2001, as an interventional cardiologist at an annual salary of $500,000 under the then-current staff physician agreement.
- Summary judgment for Weitzel on breach was improper because a genuine issue of material fact existed as to whether Sioux Valley's communications unequivocally indicated that it would not perform when performance became due.
- The loan-enforceability issue had to be reversed and remanded because the existence of a breach had to be determined before deciding whether Sioux Valley prevented the condition precedent to loan forgiveness.
- The circuit court properly granted Sioux Valley summary judgment on the fraud and deceit claim because Weitzel presented no sufficient probative evidence that Sioux Valley promised employment without intending to perform.
Questions Presented
- Whether the July 14, 2000 agreement created an enforceable employment contract rather than merely an agreement to agree.
- Whether summary judgment was proper on whether Sioux Valley breached the employment contract.
- Whether Sioux Valley prevented the occurrence of a condition precedent to loan forgiveness and whether the demand notes were enforceable.
- Whether Weitzel produced sufficient probative evidence to survive summary judgment on his fraud and deceit claim.
Disposition
reversed_and_remanded
Cases Cited (36)
- Titus v. Chapman, 2004 SD 106, ¶ 13, 687 N.W.2d 918, 923(followed)
- Sherburn v. Patterson Farms, Inc., 1999 SD 47, ¶ 4, 593 N.W.2d 414, 416(followed)
- City of Colton v. Schwebach, 1997 SD 4, ¶ 8, 557 N.W.2d 769, 771(followed)
- Morgan v. Baldwin, 450 N.W.2d 783, 785 (S.D. 1990)(followed)
- Westfield Ins. Co., Inc. v. Rowe, 2001 SD 87, ¶ 4, 631 N.W.2d 175, 176(followed)
- Estate of Juhnke v. Marquardt, 2001 SD 26, ¶ 5, 623 N.W.2d 731, 732(followed)
- Stoebner v. South Dakota Farm Bureau Mut. Ins. Co., 1999 SD 106, ¶ 6, 598 N.W.2d 557, 558(followed)
- Weiss v. Van Norman, 1997 SD 40, ¶¶ 9, 11 n.2, 562 N.W.2d 113, 115-16(followed)
- South Dakota State Cement Plant Comm'n v. Wausau Underwriters Ins. Co., 2000 SD 116, ¶ 9, 616 N.W.2d 397, 401(followed)
- Parsons v. Dacy, 502 N.W.2d 108, 110 (S.D. 1993)(followed)
Showing top 10 of 36.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…