Summary
The Supreme Court of South Dakota answered a certified question concerning whether a volunteer firefighter driving his personal vehicle to a fire hall in response to an emergency call was rendering emergency care or services under SDCL 20-9-4.1. The court held that the Good Samaritan statute applied to the driving, precluding liability absent willful, wanton, or reckless conduct.
Holdings
- A volunteer firefighter driving a personal vehicle to the fire hall in response to an emergency fire call is rendering emergency care or services during an emergency within the meaning of SDCL 20-9-4.1.
- The statute shields the rescuer from any civil damages arising from covered emergency care or services, not merely damages suffered by the person receiving the emergency aid, subject to the statutory exclusion for willful, wanton, or reckless conduct.
Questions Presented
- Whether a volunteer firefighter driving his personal vehicle to the fire hall in response to an emergency fire call is rendering emergency care or services during an emergency under SDCL 20-9-4.1.
- Whether the statute's motor-vehicle immunity applies to civil damages suffered by an injured third-party passenger, subject to the statutory exception for willful, wanton, or reckless conduct.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (8)
- Wiersma v. Maple Leaf Farms, 1996 SD 16, 543 N.W.2d 787(followed)
- Unruh v. Davison County, 2008 SD 9, 744 N.W.2d 839(followed)
- Culhane v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States, 65 S.D. 337, 274 N.W. 315 (1937)(followed)
- Thompson v. Summers, 1997 SD 103, 567 N.W.2d 387(followed)
- Rotenberger v. Burghduff, 2007 SD 7, 727 N.W.2d 291(followed)
- Chapman v. Chapman, 2006 SD 36, 713 N.W.2d 572(followed)
- Hutton v. Logan, 152 N.C. App. 94, 566 S.E.2d 782 (2002)(distinguished)
- State v. Burdick, 2006 SD 23, 712 N.W.2d 5(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…