Summary
This is a court order ruling on a plaintiff's motion for leave to conduct additional discovery and to stay proceedings in response to a summary judgment motion. The court denies the request for additional discovery but grants a brief stay, extending the plaintiff's response deadline.
Holdings
- Plaintiff was not entitled to conduct the requested belated additional discovery because she had not demonstrated good cause for failing to conduct it before the discovery deadline.
- The court granted Plaintiff's request for additional time and extended her deadline to respond to Defendants' motion for summary judgment from December 15, 2025, to December 22, 2025.
Questions Presented
- Whether Plaintiff was entitled under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56(d) to conduct additional discovery after the liability-discovery deadline.
- Whether the proceedings should be stayed or Plaintiff's deadline to respond to Defendants' dispositive motion should be extended while the court considered the motion.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (3)
- Christensen v. Weiss, 145 F.4th 743, 754-55 (7th Cir. 2025)(followed)
- Dakaj v. Holder, 580 F.3d 479, 484 (7th Cir. 2009)(followed)
- Gross v. Town of Cicero, Ill., 528 F.3d 498, 499-500 (7th Cir. 2008)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…