Summary
The Appellate Division, First Department granted the Attorney Grievance Committee's motion for reciprocal discipline against Barbara Jayne Resnick. Based on her Connecticut public reprimand for holding herself out as an attorney while administratively suspended, the court publicly censured her in New York.
Holdings
- None of the defenses authorized by 22 NYCRR 1240.13(b) was available because respondent received notice and an opportunity to be heard, the Connecticut determination was supported by her own admission, and the misconduct would constitute professional misconduct in New York.
- Public censure was the appropriate New York sanction because it was commensurate with Connecticut's public reprimand and consistent with First Department precedent addressing comparable misconduct.
Questions Presented
- Whether respondent was subject to reciprocal discipline in New York based on Connecticut's public reprimand.
- Whether any of the defenses under 22 NYCRR 1240.13(b)—lack of due process, infirmity of proof, or conduct not constituting misconduct in New York—was available.
- What sanction should be imposed in New York.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (7)
- Matter of Milara, 194 AD3d 108, 110-111 [1st Dept 2021](followed)
- Matter of Tabacco, 171 AD3d 163 [1st Dept 2019](followed)
- Matter of Blumenthal, 165 AD3d 85 [1st Dept 2018](followed)
- Matter of Karambelas, 203 AD3d 75 [1st Dept 2022](followed)
- Matter of McHallam, 160 AD3d 89 [1st Dept 2018](followed)
- Matter of Valvano, 186 AD3d 1 [1st Dept 2020](followed)
- Matter of Block, 116 AD3d 163 [1st Dept 2014](followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…