Disciplinary Counsel v. Collins

2025-Ohio-5393 · Supreme Court of Ohio · December 4, 2025 · No. 2025-0793

Summary

The Supreme Court of Ohio held that attorney Cedric Preston Collins violated Prof.Cond.R. 8.4(c) by submitting inaccurate and undocumented fee applications for court-appointed legal services. The court imposed a two-year suspension from the practice of law, stayed in its entirety on the condition that Collins commit no further misconduct.

Holdings

  1. Collins violated Prof.Cond.R. 8.4(c) by submitting inaccurate and undocumented certified fee applications, and his conduct constituted misrepresentation rather than intentional dishonesty, deceit, or fraud.
  2. A two-year suspension from the practice of law, stayed in its entirety on the condition that Collins commit no further misconduct, is the appropriate sanction.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether Collins's submission of inaccurate and undocumented fee applications constituted misrepresentation in violation of Prof.Cond.R. 8.4(c).
  2. What sanction was appropriate for Collins's misconduct in light of the aggravating and mitigating factors and comparable attorney-discipline cases.

Disposition

other

Cases Cited (10)

  • Disciplinary Counsel v. McCloskey, 2023-Ohio-3447(applied and compared)
  • Disciplinary Counsel v. Karris, 2011-Ohio-4243(followed and qualified)
  • Disciplinary Counsel v. Kraemer, 2010-Ohio-3300(followed)
  • Disciplinary Counsel v. Fowerbaugh, 1995-Ohio-261(followed)
  • Disciplinary Counsel v. Markijohn, 2003-Ohio-4129(followed)
  • Dayton Bar Assn. v. Kinney, 2000-Ohio-445(followed)
  • Disciplinary Counsel v. Agopian, 2006-Ohio-6510(distinguished)
  • Lorain Cty. Bar Assn. v. Robinson, 2021-Ohio-2123(distinguished)
  • Toledo Bar Assn. v. Stahlbush, 2010-Ohio-3823(distinguished)
  • Dayton Bar Assn. v. Swift, 2014-Ohio-4835(distinguished)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…