John Brown v. George Gaydos, an Individual t/d/b/a Gaydos Construction

Brown v. Gaydos · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · February 18, 2026 · No. 22 WAP 2024

Summary

The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania considers whether co-employee immunity under Section 72 of the Pennsylvania Workers’ Compensation Act requires the allegedly negligent employee to have been acting in furtherance of employment duties when the injury occurred. The Court concludes that summary judgment was improper because a genuine issue of material fact existed regarding whether George Gaydos’s alleged acts or omissions occurred while he was in the same employ as John Brown. The Court affirms the Superior Court’s order and remands for further proceedings.

Holdings

  1. To obtain co-employee immunity in a civil negligence action under 77 P.S. § 72, the defendant must establish both that the disability or death was compensable under the Workers' Compensation Act and that the act or omission forming the basis of civil liability occurred while the defendant was in the same employ as the injured party. The defendant must therefore have been acting in the course or scope of employment when the relevant act or omission occurred.
  2. Summary judgment was improper because genuine issues of material fact existed regarding whether Gaydos's alleged negligence in maintaining and inspecting the skid loader occurred while he was in the same employ as Brown or instead occurred in Gaydos's independent capacity as an individual or sole-proprietorship owner.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether Section 72 of the Pennsylvania Workers' Compensation Act grants co-employee immunity when the plaintiff's injury is compensable under the Act and the plaintiff and defendant work for the same company, without regard to whether the defendant's allegedly negligent act or omission occurred while acting in the same employ.
  2. Whether genuine issues of material fact existed regarding whether Gaydos's alleged negligent maintenance and inspection of the skid loader occurred while Gaydos was in the same employ as Brown, thereby precluding summary judgment.

Disposition

affirmed

Cases Cited (22)

  • Apple v. Reichert, 278 A.2d 482 (Pa. 1971)(followed and limited)
  • Herold v. University of Pittsburgh, 329 A.3d 1159, 1180-83 (Pa. 2025)(followed)
  • Pyeritz v. Commonwealth, 32 A.3d 687, 692 (Pa. 2011)(followed)
  • Weaver v. Lancaster Newspapers, Inc., 926 A.2d 899, 902-03 (Pa. 2007)(followed)
  • Toy v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co., 928 A.2d 186, 195 n.11 (Pa. 2007)(followed)
  • Lance v. Wyeth, 85 A.3d 434, 453 (Pa. 2014)(followed)
  • Salsberg v. Mann, 310 A.3d 104, 124 (Pa. 2024)(followed)
  • Hoffman v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (Westmoreland Hospital), 741 A.2d 1286, 1287 (Pa. 1999)(followed)
  • Ball v. Chapman, 289 A.3d 1, 26-27 (Pa. 2023)(followed)
  • Shearer v. Naftzinger, 747 A.2d 859, 861 (Pa. 2000)(followed)

Showing top 10 of 22.

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…