Berkeley Research Group, LLC v. Southern Advanced Materials, LLC

No. W2023-00720-SC-R11-CV · Supreme Court of Tennessee · January 23, 2026 · No. W2023-00720-SC-R11-CV

Summary

The Tennessee Supreme Court held that Tennessee courts lack subject matter jurisdiction to confirm an arbitration award when the parties’ agreement provides that arbitration will occur exclusively in another state. Because the agreement required arbitration in Pennsylvania, the Shelby County Chancery Court lacked jurisdiction to confirm the award. The court vacated the lower-court judgments and dismissed the petition to confirm the award.

Holdings

  1. Under Tennessee's Uniform Arbitration Act, Tennessee courts have subject matter jurisdiction to confirm an arbitration award only when the arbitration agreement provides for arbitration in Tennessee. Because the parties' agreement required arbitration exclusively in Pennsylvania, the Shelby County Chancery Court lacked subject matter jurisdiction to confirm the award.
  2. The Court did not decide whether Southern had sufficient contacts with Tennessee or consented to personal jurisdiction by contract because the lack of subject matter jurisdiction was dispositive.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether Tennessee courts have subject matter jurisdiction under the Uniform Arbitration Act to confirm an arbitration award when the parties' agreement requires arbitration to occur exclusively in another state.
  2. Whether the court had personal jurisdiction over Southern based on the arbitration agreement's provision that judgment on an award may be entered by any state or federal court having jurisdiction.

Disposition

vacated

Cases Cited (21)

  • Johnson v. Hopkins, 432 S.W.3d 840, 844 (Tenn. 2013)(followed)
  • In re Estate of Trigg, 368 S.W.3d 483, 489 (Tenn. 2012)(followed)
  • Northland Insurance v. State, 33 S.W.3d 727, 729 (Tenn. 2000)(followed)
  • Meighan v. U.S. Sprint Communications Co., 924 S.W.2d 632, 639 (Tenn. 1996)(followed)
  • New v. Dumitrache, 604 S.W.3d 1, 14-15 (Tenn. 2020)(followed)
  • Houghton v. Malibu Boats, LLC, No. E2023-00324-SC-R11-CV, 2025 WL 2971436, at *6 n.12 (Tenn. Oct. 22, 2025)(followed)
  • Morgan Keegan & Co. v. Smythe, 401 S.W.3d 595, 602-03, 603, 606, 612 (Tenn. 2013)(followed)
  • Buraczynski v. Eyring, 919 S.W.2d 314, 317 (Tenn. 1996)(followed)
  • Cavalier Insurance v. Osment, 538 S.W.2d 399, 403 (Tenn. 1976)(followed)
  • St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. Kirkpatrick, 164 S.W. 1186, 1189 (Tenn. 1914)(historical discussion)

Showing top 10 of 21.

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…