Summary
The Delaware Supreme Court affirmed Walike C. Parham’s convictions and 56-year sentence arising from multiple attempted-murder, firearm, theft, conspiracy, and related offenses. The Court granted the State’s motion to affirm after reviewing counsel’s no-merit brief and motion to withdraw under Delaware Supreme Court Rule 26(c), concluding that the appeal presented no arguably appealable issues.
Holdings
- Counsel satisfied Rule 26(c) because counsel made a conscientious examination of the record and the law and identified no arguably appealable issue.
- The appeal was wholly without merit and devoid of any arguably appealable issues.
Questions Presented
- Whether appellate counsel satisfied the requirements for withdrawal under Delaware Supreme Court Rule 26(c) by conducting a conscientious examination of the record and law.
- Whether the appeal contained any arguably appealable issue requiring adversary presentation.
- Whether the Superior Court's judgment should be affirmed.
Disposition
affirmed
Cases Cited (3)
- Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83 (1988)(applied)
- McCoy v. Court of Appeals of Wis., 486 U.S. 429, 442 (1988)(applied)
- Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967)(applied)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…