Hernandez v. Bushwick Realty Holdings LLC

Hernandez, 2026 NY Slip Op 03879 (Supreme Court of the State of New York Appellate Division First Department 2026) · Supreme Court of the State of New York, Appellate Division, First Department · June 18, 2026 · No. Index No. 23014/18; Appeal No. 6922; Case No. 2025-03642

Summary

The Appellate Division, First Department, affirmed an order granting the plaintiff summary judgment on liability under Labor Law § 240(1) arising from a fall from a ladder at a construction site. The court held that the ladder's sudden movement established a prima facie violation, and that alleged misuse, contradictory testimony, and expert opinions did not raise a triable issue of fact.

Holdings

  1. Hernandez established prima facie entitlement to summary judgment on his Labor Law § 240(1) claim through testimony that he fell when the ladder suddenly moved, and Capital Concrete failed to raise a triable issue of fact.
  2. Any alleged misuse of the ladder constituted, at most, comparative negligence and was not a defense to the Labor Law § 240(1) claim; Hernandez's contradictory accounts were immaterial because he consistently testified that the ladder moved and caused his fall.
  3. Capital Concrete's expert opinion that the ladder was secured and could not have moved was speculative and insufficient to defeat summary judgment because the expert did not physically inspect the ladder.
  4. The court did not reach the merits of Capital Concrete's Labor Law § 241(6) arguments because its affirmance of summary judgment on the Labor Law § 240(1) claim made those arguments academic.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether Hernandez was entitled to summary judgment as to liability on his Labor Law § 240(1) claim based on his testimony that the ladder suddenly moved and caused his fall.
  2. Whether Hernandez's alleged misuse of the ladder, contradictory testimony, or failure to use an available staircase raised a triable issue of fact or established that he was the sole proximate cause of the accident.
  3. Whether Capital Concrete's expert opinion that the ladder could not have moved raised a triable issue of fact.
  4. Whether the court needed to reach Capital Concrete's arguments concerning Hernandez's Labor Law § 241(6) claim after affirming summary judgment under Labor Law § 240(1).

Disposition

affirmed

Cases Cited (8)

  • Rom v. Eurostruct, Inc., 158 AD3d 570, 571 (1st Dept 2018)(followed)
  • Pinzon v. Royal Charter Props., Inc., 211 AD3d 442, 443 (1st Dept 2022)(followed)
  • Hoxhaj v. West 30th HL LLC, 195 AD3d 503, 504 (1st Dept 2021)(followed)
  • Bradley v. IBEX Constr., LLC, 54 AD3d 626, 627 (1st Dept 2008)(followed)
  • Ellerbe v. Port Auth. of N.Y. & N.J., 91 AD3d 441, 442 (1st Dept 2012)(followed)
  • Rivera v. 712 Fifth Ave. Owner LP, 229 AD3d 401, 402-403 (1st Dept 2024)(followed)
  • Garces v. Windsor Plaza, LLC, 189 AD3d 539, 539 (1st Dept 2020)(followed)
  • Fanning v. Rockefeller Univ., 106 AD3d 484, 485 (1st Dept 2013)(followed)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…