Summary
The Appellate Division, First Department unanimously affirmed an order adjudicating Paulino Camacho a level three sexually violent predicate sex offender under the Sex Offender Registration Act. The court held that the lower court providently exercised its discretion in declining a downward departure, citing Camacho’s extensive criminal history and the absence of mitigating factors sufficient to warrant departure.
Holdings
- Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying Camacho's request for a downward departure from the level three sex-offender classification.
- The Gillotti downward-departure analysis applies in full even when the defendant's level three classification is based on an override.
Questions Presented
- Whether Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in declining to grant a downward departure from the level three sex-offender risk classification.
- Whether the Gillotti downward-departure analysis applies when the level three classification is based on an override.
Disposition
affirmed
Cases Cited (2)
- People v. Gillotti, 23 N.Y.3d 841, 861 (2014)(followed)
- People v. Lafrem, 242 A.D.3d 644, 644 (1st Dep't 2025)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…