Summary
The Appellate Division, First Department unanimously affirmed an order denying MicroAlgo, Inc.'s motion to dismiss a breach of contract claim. The court held that the Registration Rights Agreement's best-efforts obligation to file a registration statement was enforceable because the agreement provided objective standards for performance and timing.
Holdings
- The complaint sufficiently stated a claim for breach of contract by alleging that MicroAlgo breached the Registration Rights Agreement by failing to file a registration statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission despite Yolanda's written demand.
- The obligation to file a registration statement was enforceable despite the agreement's best-efforts language because the agreement provided sufficiently objective standards for measuring the timing and performance of the obligation.
Questions Presented
- Whether the complaint sufficiently stated a breach of contract claim based on MicroAlgo's alleged failure to file a registration statement after Yolanda's written demand.
- Whether the Registration Rights Agreement's best-efforts obligation was enforceable or impermissibly indefinite.
Disposition
affirmed
Cases Cited (3)
- Citigroup Global Mkts. Inc. v SCIP Capital Mgt., LLC, 225 AD3d 420, 421 [1st Dept 2024](followed)
- Savasta v 470 Newport Assocs., 82 NY2d 763, 765 [1993](followed)
- Non-Linear Trading Co. v Braddis Assoc., 243 AD2d 107, 114 [1st Dept 1998](distinguished)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…