Summary
The New York Appellate Division, Second Department, affirmed an order denying defendants’ motion to vacate a default judgment and dismiss the complaint as abandoned. The court held that defendants failed to provide a reasonable excuse for their default under CPLR 5015(a)(1), and therefore relief under CPLR 3404 was also unavailable.
Holdings
- The defendants failed to demonstrate a reasonable excuse for their default because their conclusory and unsubstantiated claim of law office failure amounted to mere neglect. Because they failed to establish a reasonable excuse, the court did not need to consider whether they had a potentially meritorious defense.
- The defendants were not entitled to dismissal of the complaint as abandoned because the judgment had been entered upon their default and they failed to establish any grounds for relief from that judgment.
Questions Presented
- Whether the defendants established a reasonable excuse for their default and a potentially meritorious defense sufficient to vacate the judgment under CPLR 5015(a)(1).
- Whether the complaint should be dismissed as abandoned under CPLR 3404 after entry of a judgment upon the defendants' default.
Disposition
affirmed
Cases Cited (7)
- Zirrith v. Rego, 230 A.D.3d 626(followed)
- Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Lewis, 232 A.D.3d 649(followed)
- Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Hakim, 230 A.D.3d 1271(followed)
- Yaghmour v. Mittal, 208 A.D.3d 1283(followed)
- HSBC Bank USA, N.A. v. Joseph, 209 A.D.3d 633(followed)
- Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Eliacin, 206 A.D.3d 950(followed)
- Holubar v. Holubar, 89 A.D.3d 802(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…