Summary
The Appellate Division, Second Department reversed an order denying Galo Pacheco's motion for summary judgment on liability under Labor Law § 240(1). The court held that B Green Construction Corp. was a statutory agent of the property owner and that the plaintiff established that defective scaffolding proximately caused his injuries. The court granted the plaintiff's motion for summary judgment.
Holdings
- B Green was a statutory agent of the owner because it selected and directly contracted with R & S to perform the masonry work and had authority to stop that work for safety concerns.
- Pacheco established prima facie entitlement to summary judgment on liability because he fell from loose and unsecured planks atop scaffolding and the defective scaffolding proximately caused his injuries; the respondents failed to raise a triable issue of fact.
- Contributory negligence is not a defense to a Labor Law § 240(1) claim, and, after Pacheco made a prima facie showing of a statutory violation and proximate causation, any failure to use available safety devices did not defeat his motion.
Questions Presented
- Whether B Green Construction Corp. was a statutory agent of the owner under Labor Law § 240(1) because it had the authority to supervise and control the masonry work.
- Whether Pacheco established prima facie entitlement to summary judgment on liability under Labor Law § 240(1) by showing that he fell from defective scaffolding because appropriate safety devices were not provided.
- Whether the respondents raised a triable issue of fact based on alleged inconsistencies in Pacheco's testimony or his alleged failure to use available safety devices.
Disposition
reversed
Cases Cited (19)
- McNamara v Gusmar Enters., LLC, 204 AD3d 779, 781(followed)
- Guaman v 178 Ct. St., LLC, 200 AD3d 655, 657(followed)
- Caiazzo v Mark Joseph Contr., Inc., 119 AD3d 718, 720(followed)
- Moran v Trustees of Columbia Univ. in the City of N.Y., 224 AD3d 830, 833(followed)
- Kavouras v Steel-More Contr. Corp., 192 AD3d 782, 784(followed)
- Williams v Dover Home Improvement, 276 AD2d 626, 626(followed)
- Argueta v Hall & Wright, LLC, 230 AD3d 1200, 1202(followed)
- Cabrera v Arrow Steel Window Corp., 163 AD3d 758, 759(followed)
- Padilla v Park Plaza Owners Corp., 165 AD3d 1272, 1274(followed)
- Saint v Syracuse Supply Co., 25 NY3d 117, 124(followed)
Showing top 10 of 19.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…