Summary
The Appellate Division, Second Department affirmed an order granting the defendants summary judgment in a personal-injury action arising from the plaintiff's fall on an area rug while cleaning the defendants' home. The court held that the defendants established that the rug was not defective and that its placement was open and obvious and not inherently dangerous. The plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact.
Holdings
- The defendants established their prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by demonstrating that the premises were maintained in a reasonably safe condition, that the area rug was not defective, and that its placement was readily observable and not inherently dangerous under the circumstances.
- The plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact in opposition to the defendants' motion.
Questions Presented
- Whether the defendants established entitlement to summary judgment in a slip-and-fall action by showing that they maintained the premises in a reasonably safe condition and that the area rug's placement was open and obvious and not inherently dangerous.
- Whether the plaintiff raised a triable issue of fact in opposition to the defendants' summary-judgment motion.
Disposition
affirmed
Cases Cited (14)
- Niyazov v Ditmas Mgt. Corp., 237 AD3d 1104, 1105(followed)
- Beier v Giglio, 230 AD3d 733, 733(followed)
- Naftaliyeva v Shoprite of Ave. I, 233 AD3d 793, 794(followed)
- Martinez v Fairfield Hills E., LLC, 213 AD3d 837, 837(followed)
- Parrinello v Independence Plaza SC, LLC, 189 AD3d 1441, 1442(followed)
- Velazquez v County of Westchester, 237 AD3d 1137, 1139(followed)
- Rider v Manhattan Monster, Inc., 208 AD3d 807, 808(followed)
- Evans v Fields, 217 AD3d 656, 656(followed)
- Tamburo v Long Is. Univ., 229 AD3d 828, 829(followed)
- Trincere v County of Suffolk, 90 NY2d 976, 977(followed)
Showing top 10 of 14.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…