Summary
The New York Appellate Division, Second Department, affirmed an order granting Lalezarian Properties, LLC leave to reargue and, upon reargument, summary judgment dismissing the plaintiff’s personal-injury claims against it. The court held that Lalezarian established that it did not own, manage, operate, control, or maintain the property where the plaintiff slipped on black ice, and the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact.
Holdings
- The Supreme Court properly granted Lalezarian leave to reargue because reargument may be granted when the prior court overlooked or misapprehended facts or law or otherwise mistakenly reached its earlier decision.
- Lalezarian was entitled to summary judgment dismissing the amended complaint against it because it established that it did not own the property where the accident occurred, and Mosca failed to raise a triable issue of fact.
Questions Presented
- Whether the Supreme Court properly granted Lalezarian leave to reargue its prior summary judgment motion.
- Whether Lalezarian was entitled to summary judgment dismissing the amended complaint because it did not own the property where Mosca's accident occurred.
Disposition
affirmed
Cases Cited (5)
- Kinard v. New York City Tr. Auth., 233 AD3d 665, 666(followed)
- Hallett v. City of New York, 219 AD3d 809, 810(followed)
- Misa v. Town of Brookhaven, 212 AD3d 804, 805-806(followed)
- Deutsch v. Green Hills [USA], LLC, 202 AD3d 909, 911(followed)
- Kennedy v. Hennessey, 211 AD3d 833, 833(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…