Vilca v. Kim

2026 NY Slip Op 01088 · Supreme Court of the State of New York, Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department · February 25, 2026 · No. 2023-07401

Summary

The Appellate Division, Second Department affirmed an amended judgment of divorce insofar as it awarded the plaintiff a separate property credit for funds contributed toward the marital residence and awarded the defendant maintenance of $2,400 per month for one year. The court held that the plaintiff overcame the presumption that commingled funds were marital property and that the maintenance award was a provident exercise of the trial court's discretion.

Holdings

  1. The trial court properly awarded plaintiff a $226,557 separate-property credit because plaintiff presented sufficient evidence to overcome the presumption that commingled funds in a joint account were marital property.
  2. The trial court's award of maintenance of $2,400 per month for one year was a provident exercise of discretion and was affirmed.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether plaintiff established that funds contributed toward the purchase of the marital residence were separate property despite defendant's later addition to the account.
  2. Whether the trial court abused its discretion by awarding defendant maintenance of $2,400 per month for only one year.
  3. Whether any remaining contention raised by defendant warranted reversal.

Disposition

affirmed

Cases Cited (10)

  • Westreich v Westreich, 169 AD3d 972, 977(followed)
  • Sinnott v Sinnott, 194 AD3d 868, 871(followed)
  • Signorile v Signorile, 102 AD3d 949, 950(followed)
  • Renck v Renck, 131 AD3d 1146, 1149(followed)
  • Wade v Steinfeld, 15 AD3d 390, 391(followed)
  • Sherman v Sherman, 304 AD2d 744, 744(distinguished)
  • Mahoney v Mahoney, 197 AD3d 638, 639(followed)
  • Torkin v Susac, 236 AD3d 1082, 1085(followed)
  • D'Iorio v D'Iorio, 135 AD3d 693, 695(followed)
  • Culen v Culen, 157 AD3d 926, 928(followed)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…