Summary
The Appellate Division, Second Department affirmed an order of the Family Court, Kings County, that denied a Family Court Act article 8 petition and dismissed the proceeding. The court held that the petitioner failed to establish by a fair preponderance of the evidence that his brother committed a family offense and declined to disturb the Family Court's credibility determination.
Holdings
- The petitioner failed to establish by a fair preponderance of the evidence that his brother committed a family offense, and the Family Court's determination was supported by the record.
- The Family Court's credibility determination was entitled to great weight and provided no basis for appellate disturbance because it was not clearly unsupported by the record.
Questions Presented
- Whether the Family Court's determination that the petitioner failed to prove by a fair preponderance of the evidence that the respondent committed a family offense was supported by the record.
- Whether the Family Court's credibility determination should be disturbed on appeal.
Disposition
affirmed
Cases Cited (7)
- Matter of Singh v Kaur, 213 AD3d 771, 771(followed)
- Matter of Porter v Moore, 149 AD3d 1082, 1083(followed)
- Matter of Limanov v Limanov, 225 AD3d 872(followed)
- Matter of Paek v Alicea, 225 AD3d 877, 878-879(followed)
- Matter of Goldring v Sprei, 121 AD3d 894, 895(followed)
- Matter of Townes v Diggs, 216 AD3d 1104, 1105(followed)
- M.B. v L.T., 152 AD3d 475, 476(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…