State Farm Fire & Casualty Company v. Dan Heller Plumbing and Heating, Inc.

2025 NY Slip Op 06635 (Supreme Court of the State of New York Appellate Division Second Judicial Department 2025) · Supreme Court of the State of New York, Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department · November 26, 2025 · No. 2022-06670

Summary

The Appellate Division, Second Department, affirmed an order granting summary judgment to Brownstones Coffee, Inc. and Country Fare Market, Inc. in a subrogation action arising from a commercial-property fire. The court held that State Farm was judicially estopped from challenging waiver-of-subrogation clauses because its subrogor, New Age Management, LLC, had previously relied on those clauses in related actions. The court also concluded that the defendants established that the leases' waiver provisions barred State Farm's claims.

Holdings

  1. State Farm was precluded by judicial estoppel from contesting the enforceability of the waiver-of-subrogation clauses because its subrogor, New Age, had previously advanced and prevailed on the position that the same clauses barred related subrogation actions.
  2. Brownstones and Country Fare were entitled to summary judgment dismissing State Farm's third amended complaint because the waiver-of-subrogation clauses in their respective leases with New Age barred the claims.
  3. An insurer asserting subrogation rights can recover only to the extent its insured could have recovered and remains subject to defenses that could have been asserted against the insured.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether State Farm was judicially estopped from contesting the enforceability of waiver-of-subrogation clauses after its subrogor, New Age, successfully relied on those clauses in related actions within the same proceeding.
  2. Whether Brownstones and Country Fare were entitled to summary judgment dismissing State Farm's subrogation claims based on the waiver-of-subrogation clauses in their leases with New Age.
  3. Whether State Farm established prima facie entitlement to summary judgment dismissing the tenants' affirmative defenses based on the waiver-of-subrogation clauses.

Disposition

affirmed

Cases Cited (12)

  • Cobenas v. Ginsburg Dev. Cos., LLC, 133 AD3d 812, 813(followed)
  • McEvoy v. McEvoy, 219 AD3d 1513, 1516(followed)
  • Cussick v. R.L. Baxter Bldg. Corp., 228 AD3d 614, 616(followed)
  • McGlynn v. Burns & Harris, Esq., 223 AD3d 733, 735(followed)
  • Flanders v. E.W. Howell Co., LLC, 193 AD3d 822, 823-824(followed)
  • Riconda v. Liberty Ins. Underwriters, Inc., 187 AD3d 1081, 1082(followed)
  • Matter of Hartsdale Fire Dist. v. Eastland Constr., Inc., 65 AD3d 1345, 1346(followed)
  • H & R Block Bank v. Page, 199 AD3d 780, 783(followed)
  • Matter of Arriaga v. Dukoff, 123 AD3d 1023, 1025-1026, affd 28 NY3d 1(followed)
  • Winegrad v. New York Univ. Med. Ctr., 64 NY2d 851, 852(followed)

Showing top 10 of 12.

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…

More from Supreme Court Of The State Of New York Appellate Division Second Judicial Department Supreme Court O