Summary
The Appellate Division, Second Department reversed an order granting a downward modification of the plaintiff's child support obligation. The court held that the plaintiff failed to establish a substantial change in circumstances and noted that the parties had waived modification based on an involuntary income change of 15% or more.
Holdings
- The plaintiff failed to establish a substantial change in circumstances warranting a downward modification because, despite his loss of income during the COVID-19 pandemic, his financial resources showed that he remained able to provide support at the stipulated level.
- The parties' agreement to waive modification of child support based on an involuntary change in income of 15% or more was an additional reason supporting denial of the plaintiff's motion.
Questions Presented
- Whether the plaintiff established a substantial change in circumstances warranting a downward modification of his child support obligation.
- Whether the parties' agreement waiving modification based on an involuntary income change of 15% or more supported denial of the modification motion.
Disposition
reversed
Cases Cited (6)
- Maria v. Ramadan, 219 AD3d 874, 875(followed)
- Zeidman v. Zeidman, 202 AD3d 893, 894(followed)
- Lueker v. Lueker, 132 AD3d 739, 741(followed)
- Muldowney-Walsh v. Desroches, 167 AD3d 1022, 1023(followed)
- Schwaber v. Schwaber, 91 AD3d 939, 940(followed)
- Matter of Oelsner v. Heppler, 181 AD3d 916, 917-918(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…