Summary
The Appellate Division, Second Department reversed an order imposing a $250-per-day civil contempt fine totaling $48,750 against the Administration for Children's Services for failing to place a child in a traditional foster home. The court held that actual injury was established, but the fine was improperly based on the statutory maximum for unprovable damages and appeared punitive rather than reasonably related to the injury. The matter was remitted to the Family Court, Kings County, for a new determination of the compensatory fine.
Holdings
- The Family Court correctly determined that the child suffered actual injury as a result of the contemptuous failure to comply with the placement order; the evidence of actual injury was not unduly conjectural.
- The agency's contention that the Family Court improperly considered hearsay testimony about the child's injuries was unpreserved because the agency did not object to admission of the testimony during the contempt hearing.
- The Family Court improperly imposed a $250-per-day fine based on the statutory maximum for unprovable damages. When actual losses are shown to be actual and reasonably ascertainable, the court must impose a reasonably certain compensatory fine properly related to the scope of the injury.
Questions Presented
- Whether the evidence sufficiently established that the child suffered actual injury from the agency's contemptuous failure to comply with the placement order.
- Whether the Family Court properly considered hearsay testimony about the child's injuries when the agency did not object at the contempt hearing.
- Whether the Family Court properly imposed a $250-per-day fine based on the agency's noncompliance after finding that the child suffered actual and ascertainable injury.
Disposition
reversed_and_remanded
Cases Cited (15)
- Matter of East End Hangars, Inc. v Town of E. Hampton, N.Y., 225 AD3d 865, 868-869(followed)
- Matter of Mendoza-Pautrat v Razdan, 160 AD3d 963, 964(followed)
- Matter of Department of Hous. Preserv. & Dev. of City of N.Y. v Deka Realty Corp., 208 AD2d 37, 43, 45(followed)
- Matter of Ferrante v Stanford, 172 AD3d 31, 39(followed)
- State of New York v Unique Ideas, 44 NY2d 345, 350(followed)
- McCain v Dinkins, 84 NY2d 216, 229(followed)
- Glanzman v Fischman, 135 AD2d 493(followed)
- Matter of Kevon G. [Keith G.], 196 AD3d 572, 573-574(followed)
- Matter of Kaiser v Orange County Dept. of Social Servs., 34 AD3d 586, 587(followed)
- Costor v AT&T Servs., Inc., 187 AD3d 1135, 1136-1137(followed)
Showing top 10 of 15.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.