Summary
The Appellate Division, Second Department affirmed a Family Court order awarding the mother sole legal and residential custody of the parties' child and denying the father's competing custody petition. The court held that the determination was supported by a sound and substantial basis in the record and served the child's best interests.
Holdings
- The Family Court's determination that the child's best interests would be served by awarding the mother sole legal and residential custody had a sound and substantial basis in the record and would not be disturbed.
Questions Presented
- Whether the Family Court properly modified the parties' custody stipulation to award the mother sole legal and residential custody.
- Whether the Family Court properly denied the father's request for sole legal and residential custody.
- Whether the Family Court's custody determination had a sound and substantial basis in the record under the child's best-interests standard.
Disposition
affirmed
Cases Cited (6)
- Eschbach v Eschbach, 56 NY2d 167, 171(applied)
- Matter of Pollack v Slasten, 237 AD3d 720, 721(applied)
- Matter of Rennie v Cooks, 195 AD3d 622(applied)
- Matter of Garrick v Simon, 197 AD3d 1316, 1316(applied)
- Matter of Supangkat v Torres, 101 AD3d 889, 890(applied)
- Matter of Murphy v Lewis, 149 AD3d 748, 749(applied)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…