Summary
The Appellate Division, Second Department, affirmed an order denying a petition to vacate an uninsured/underinsured motorist arbitration award and confirming the award. The court held that the arbitrator's determination had evidentiary support and was not arbitrary and capricious under the heightened review applicable to compulsory arbitration.
Holdings
- An award in a compulsory uninsured/underinsured motorist arbitration proceeding must have evidentiary support and cannot be arbitrary and capricious; the award here met that standard.
- The Supreme Court properly denied the petition and confirmed the arbitration award.
Questions Presented
- Whether the compulsory uninsured/underinsured motorist arbitration award satisfied the heightened judicial-review standard under CPLR 7511(b).
- Whether the Supreme Court properly denied the petition to vacate the arbitration award and confirmed the award.
Disposition
affirmed
Cases Cited (5)
- Matter of Deluca v. Arch Ins. Group, 109 AD3d 912, 913(followed)
- Matter of American Express Prop. Cas. Co. v. Vinci, 63 AD3d 1055(followed)
- Matter of Mangano v. United States Fire Ins. Co., 55 AD3d 916(followed)
- O'Shea v. Allstate Ins. Co., 215 AD3d 758, 759(followed)
- Matter of O'Neill v. GEICO Ins. Co., 162 AD3d 776, 778(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…