Summary
The Appellate Division, Second Department, affirmed an order denying the defendant's motion for maintenance arrears and civil contempt sanctions based on alleged violations of a so-ordered matrimonial stipulation. The court held that the evidence did not establish by clear and convincing evidence that the plaintiff failed to make the required maintenance payments or that any payment-by-check violation caused prejudice.
Holdings
- The defendant failed to establish by clear and convincing evidence that the plaintiff violated the maintenance provisions of the so-ordered stipulation by failing to make the required payments; therefore, the denial of maintenance arrears and civil contempt was proper.
- Even assuming that the plaintiff made some maintenance payments by check rather than by the direct-deposit method specified in the stipulation, contempt was not warranted because the defendant failed to demonstrate prejudice resulting from the alleged violation.
- The defendant's remaining contention concerning attorney's fees was not properly before the Appellate Division.
Questions Presented
- Whether the Supreme Court properly denied the defendant's motion for maintenance arrears and civil contempt where the evidence did not establish by clear and convincing evidence that the plaintiff failed to make the required maintenance payments.
- Whether alleged payment by check rather than direct deposit warranted civil-contempt relief absent a showing of prejudice.
- Whether the defendant's contention concerning attorney's fees was properly before the Appellate Division.
Disposition
affirmed
Cases Cited (11)
- Mohen v. Mohen, 53 AD3d 471, 472(followed as prior procedural history)
- Matter of DeSiena v. DeSiena, 167 AD3d 1006, 1007(followed)
- Matter of Rubackin v. Rubackin, 62 AD3d 11, 15(followed)
- Matter of Mendoza-Pautrat v. Razdan, 160 AD3d 963, 964(followed)
- Varnit v. Varnit, 233 AD3d 917, 923(followed)
- Shemtov v. Shemtov, 153 AD3d 1295, 1295-1296(followed)
- El-Dehdan v. El-Dehdan, 26 NY3d 19, 29(followed)
- Tedesco v. Elio, 211 AD3d 1074, 1076(followed)
- Ruffino v. Serio, 206 AD3d 776, 777-778(followed)
- Eschemuller v. Eschemuller, 167 AD3d 983, 986(contrasted)
Showing top 10 of 11.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…