Summary
The Appellate Division, Second Department, modified an order in a mortgage foreclosure action that permitted the plaintiff to discontinue both the action and the defendant's counterclaims. The court held that discontinuance of the action was proper, but the counterclaims should instead be severed and continued.
Holdings
- The Supreme Court properly granted Nationstar's motion to discontinue the foreclosure action because the record did not establish circumstances requiring denial of discontinuance under CPLR 3217(b).
- The Supreme Court should not have permitted Nationstar to discontinue Windward's counterclaims; the counterclaims had to be severed from the discontinued action and continued.
Questions Presented
- Whether the Supreme Court properly granted Nationstar leave under CPLR 3217(b) to voluntarily discontinue the mortgage-foreclosure action.
- Whether the Supreme Court properly allowed Nationstar to discontinue Windward Bora, LLC's counterclaims, or instead was required to sever and continue those counterclaims.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (9)
- Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Chaplin, 107 AD3d 881, 883(followed)
- Tucker v. Tucker, 55 NY2d 378, 383(followed)
- Aurora Loan Servs., LLC v. Hunte, 189 AD3d 1525, 1526(followed)
- Haughey v. Kindschuh, 176 AD3d 785, 786(followed)
- Marinelli v. Wimmer, 139 AD3d 914, 915(followed)
- Jamaica Hosp. Med. Ctr., Inc. v. Oxford Health Plans [NY], Inc., 58 AD3d 686(followed)
- Aison v. Hudson Riv. Black Riv. Regulating Dist., 279 AD2d 754, 755(followed)
- Matter of Bronsky-Graff Orthodontics, P.C., 270 AD2d 792, 793(followed)
- Banschick v. Johnson, 222 AD3d 608, 611(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…