Ewayna Mechelle Brown v. Bruce Edward Thomas

No. W2025-00934-COA-R3-CV · Court of Appeals of Tennessee at Jackson · February 12, 2026 · No. W2025-00934-COA-R3-CV

Summary

The Tennessee Court of Appeals affirmed a Shelby County Chancery Court judgment granting Bruce Edward Thomas a divorce on the ground of inappropriate marital conduct, dismissing Ewayna Mechelle Brown's complaint, and dividing the parties' property and debts. The court held that Brown waived her recusal challenge by failing to file a Tennessee Supreme Court Rule 10B motion, and it rejected her arguments concerning the divorce grounds, foreclosure-related property issues, debt allocation, default judgment, and pending motions. The court also affirmed the extension of an order of protection and remanded for further proceedings consistent with the opinion.

Holdings

  1. Wife waived her claim that the chancellor was biased because she did not file the required Tennessee Supreme Court Rule 10B motion for recusal supported by an affidavit and specific factual and legal grounds.
  2. The trial court did not err by failing to separately address Wife's allegations of adultery and abandonment because it dismissed her complaint when it granted Husband's counterpetition for divorce.
  3. The trial court did not award Husband a home because the property had been foreclosed before the divorce, and the debt allocation was not erroneous because each party was assigned debts in that party's name, with any deficiency on the former marital residence assigned to Wife.
  4. The trial court did not violate Wife's due process rights by entering default judgment and proceeding to a final decree because Wife was properly served, failed to answer the counterclaim despite additional time, and failed to set several later-filed motions for hearing as required by the applicable chancery-court rule.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the chancellor's alleged biased statements and refusal to recuse deprived Wife of an impartial tribunal.
  2. Whether the trial court erred by failing to address adultery and abandonment grounds alleged in Wife's complaint.
  3. Whether the trial court erred in awarding Husband possession of a home titled to Wife and assigning marital debt to Wife.
  4. Whether the trial court violated Wife's due process rights by entering default judgment and a final decree without hearing or ruling on pending motions.

Disposition

affirmed

Cases Cited (8)

  • Hessmer v. Hessmer, 138 S.W.3d 901, 903 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2003)(followed)
  • Hawkins v. Hart, 86 S.W.3d 522, 531 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2001)(followed)
  • Sneed v. Bd. of Pro. Resp. of Supreme Ct., 301 S.W.3d 603, 615 (Tenn. 2010)(followed)
  • Ranter v. Solomon, No. E2025-00049-COA-T10B-CV, 2025 WL 326386, at *1 (Tenn. Ct. App. Jan. 29, 2025)(followed)
  • In re Samuel P., No. W2016-01592-COA-T10B-CV, 2016 WL 4547543, at *2 (Tenn. Ct. App. Aug. 31, 2016)(followed)
  • Duke v. Duke, 398 S.W.3d 665, 671 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2012)(followed)
  • Fayne v. Vincent, 301 S.W.3d 162, 169-170 (Tenn. 2010)(followed)
  • Case v. Shelby County Civil Service Merit Board, 98 S.W.3d 167, 175 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2002)(followed)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…