Summary
Texas Attorney General Opinion No. KP-0508 concludes that advanced recycling facilities using pyrolysis on post-use polymers engage in recycling under the Texas Solid Waste Disposal Act. The opinion distinguishes advanced recycling from incineration and limits its conclusion to pyrolysis involving post-use polymers.
Holdings
- An advanced recycling facility that uses pyrolysis on post-use polymers is engaged in recycling under the Texas Solid Waste Disposal Act, so long as the materials converted are post-use polymers.
- Out-of-state litigation concerning California law provides no basis to question the conclusion under Texas law that pyrolysis of post-use polymers is recycling rather than incineration.
Questions Presented
- Whether an advanced recycling facility that uses pyrolysis on post-use polymers engages in recycling under the Texas Solid Waste Disposal Act.
- Whether out-of-state litigation characterizing advanced recycling as incineration undermines the conclusion that pyrolysis of post-use polymers is recycling under Texas law.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (4)
- City of Round Rock v. Rodriguez, 399 S.W.3d 130, 133 (Tex. 2013)(followed)
- Entergy Gulf States, Inc. v. Summers, 282 S.W.3d 433, 437 (Tex. 2009)(followed)
- Youngkin v. Hines, 546 S.W.3d 675, 680 (Tex. 2018)(followed)
- Fairfield Ins. Co. v. Stephens Martin Paving, LP, 246 S.W.3d 653, 665 (Tex. 2008)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…