Derek Kashif Price v. the State of Texas

No. 11-24-00152-CR · Texas Court of Appeals, Eleventh District · December 4, 2025 · No. No. 11-24-00152-CR

Summary

The Eleventh Court of Appeals of Texas affirmed Derek Kashif Price’s conviction for aggravated assault with a deadly weapon and his fifty-year habitual-offender sentence. Applying the Anders procedure, the court independently reviewed the record and found no arguable grounds for appeal, while granting appointed counsel’s motion to withdraw. The court noted deficiencies in counsel’s Anders brief but concluded that Price’s pro se filings showed he had reviewed the record and had an opportunity to advocate for himself.

Holdings

  1. The appeal was wholly without merit, and independent review of the record revealed no arguable issue or reversible error.
  2. The court could affirm despite counsel's deficient Anders brief because the record showed that Price had access to and reviewed the record, filed a pro se response, and the court's independent review found no arguable issue.
  3. The motion to withdraw was granted.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the appeal presented any arguable issue requiring appointment of new appellate counsel under Anders and Texas appellate procedure.
  2. Whether the court could affirm the judgment despite deficiencies in appointed counsel's Anders brief after independently reviewing the record and considering Price's pro se response.
  3. Whether appointed counsel's motion to withdraw should be granted.

Disposition

affirmed

Cases Cited (8)

  • Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967)(followed)
  • In re Schulman, 252 S.W.3d 403, 406–12 (Tex. Crim. App. 2008)(followed)
  • Pitchford v. State, No. 07-05-00254-CR, 2006 WL 1587153, at *1 (Tex. App.—Amarillo June 9, 2006) (order)(followed)
  • Kelly v. State, 436 S.W.3d 313, 318–20 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014)(followed)
  • Limauro v. State, 675 S.W.3d 368, 375 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2023, no pet.)(followed)
  • In re N.F.M., 582 S.W.3d 539, 546 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2018, no pet.) (en banc)(followed)
  • Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 826–27 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005)(followed)
  • Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991)(followed)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…