Summary
The Texas Court of Appeals for the First District dismissed the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. The trial court’s summary-judgment orders resolved claims against some defendants but left claims against Metropolitan Escrow Title, LLC and Michael Lee Fuqua pending, making the orders interlocutory. The appellate court held that the orders were neither final judgments nor otherwise authorized for interlocutory appeal.
Holdings
- The summary-judgment orders were not final appealable judgments because they did not dispose of all claims and parties and did not state with unmistakable clarity that they were final as to the entire case.
- The court lacked jurisdiction over the appeal because interlocutory appeals are permissible only when authorized by statute, and no applicable statute authorized an appeal from these orders.
Questions Presented
- Whether the trial court's summary-judgment orders were final and appealable when claims against other parties remained pending.
- Whether the court of appeals had statutory authority to exercise interlocutory appellate jurisdiction over the summary-judgment orders.
Disposition
dismissed
Cases Cited (7)
- Heckman v. Williamson Cty., 369 S.W.3d 137, 146 n.14 (Tex. 2012)(followed)
- Royal Indep. Sch. Dist. v. Ragsdale, 273 S.W.3d 759, 763 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2008, no pet.)(followed)
- Tex. A & M Univ. Sys. v. Koseoglu, 233 S.W.3d 835, 840 (Tex. 2007)(followed)
- Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 192–93, 195, 200, 204–05 (Tex. 2001)(followed)
- CMH Homes v. Perez, 340 S.W.3d 444, 447–48 (Tex. 2011)(followed)
- V.I.P. Royal Palace, LLC v. Hobby Event Ctr. LLC, No. 01-18-00621-CV, 2020 WL 3579563, at *4, *6 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] July 2, 2020, no pet.) (mem. op.)(followed)
- Bonsmara Nat. Beef Co., LLC v. Hart of Tex. Cattle Feeders, LLC, 603 S.W.3d 385, 387 (Tex. 2020)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…