Summary
This document is a pro se appellant's brief in Richard James Johnson v. Michael Venable, et al., an appeal arising from a Potter County, Texas, civil action. The brief challenges the trial court's grant of defendants' motion for summary judgment and raises issues concerning evidentiary rulings, alleged due-process violations, and the application of Texas civil-practice statutes. The document includes or reproduces the defendants' summary-judgment order dismissing the claims with prejudice.
Questions Presented
- Whether the trial court improperly granted defendants' motion for summary judgment.
- Whether the trial court abused its discretion in making evidentiary or procedural rulings during the summary judgment proceedings.
- Whether the trial court was required to conduct a factual hearing concerning the scope of defendants' employment or authority in connection with an immunity-related defense.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (4)
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317 (1986)(followed)
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242 (1986)(followed)
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co. v. Zenith Radio Corp., 475 U.S. 574 (1986)(followed)
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…