Summary
The Fifth District Court of Appeals of Texas considered a supplemental petition for writ of mandamus concerning the sequence in which the trial court handled various motions. The court held that the relator failed to demonstrate a clear abuse of discretion and denied the petition.
Holdings
- A relator seeking mandamus relief must show both that the trial court clearly abused its discretion and that the relator lacks an adequate appellate remedy; relator failed to demonstrate a clear abuse of discretion, so mandamus relief was denied.
Questions Presented
- Whether relator demonstrated that the trial court clearly abused its discretion in handling the sequence of various motions.
- Whether relator was entitled to mandamus relief.
Disposition
writ_denied
Cases Cited (1)
- In re Prudential Ins. Co., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135–36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…