Summary
The Fifth District Court of Appeals at Dallas denied Amy Hagen’s petition for writ of mandamus challenging trial court orders granting the father’s application for a writ of habeas corpus for the return of the child. The court concluded that Hagen failed to establish a clear abuse of discretion or the absence of an adequate appellate remedy.
Holdings
- The relator was not entitled to mandamus relief because she failed to show both a clear abuse of discretion by the trial court and the absence of an adequate appellate remedy.
Questions Presented
- Whether Amy Hagen established that the trial court clearly abused its discretion in granting Father's Chapter 157 habeas corpus application.
- Whether Amy Hagen lacked an adequate appellate remedy, as required for mandamus relief.
Disposition
writ_denied
Cases Cited (1)
- In re Prudential Ins. Co., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135–36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…